Skip to main content

SOLID (3/5) - Liskov substitution principle

  SOLID (3/5) - Liskov substitution principle


Substitutability is a principle in object-oriented programming stating that, in a computer program, if S is a subtype of T, then objects of type T may be replaced with objects of type S (i.e., an object of type T may be substituted with any object of a subtype S) without altering any of the desirable properties of the program (correctness, task performed, etc.). More formally, the Liskov substitution principle (LSP) is a particular definition of a subtyping relation, called (strong) behavioral subtyping. It is a semantic rather than merely syntactic relation, because it intends to guarantee semantic interoperability of types in a hierarchy, object types in particular.

using System;

namespace Liskov
{
    public class Rectangle
    {
        //public int Width { get; set; }
        //public int Height { get; set; }
        
        public virtual int Width { getset; }        
        public virtual int Height { getset; }

        public Rectangle()
        {

        }

        public Rectangle(int widthint height)
        {
            this.Width = width;
            this.Height = height;
        }

        public override string ToString()
        {
            return $"{nameof(Width)}: {Width}, {nameof(Height)}: {Height}";
        }
    }

    public class Square : Rectangle 
    {
        //public new int Width
        public override int Width
        { 
            set { base.Width = base.Height = value; } 
        }
        //public new int Height
        public override int Height
        { 
            set { base.Width = base.Height = value; } 
        }
    }

    class Program
    {
        public static int Area(Rectangle r) => r.Height * r.Width;

        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            Rectangle r = new Rectangle(2,3);
            Console.WriteLine($"{r} as area {Area(r)}");

            Rectangle s = new Square();
            s.Width = 8;
            Console.WriteLine($"{s} as area {Area(s)}");
        }
    }
}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

API Security

API Security source:  https://www.apisecuniversity.com/ Tools Kali Linux https://www.kali.org/ $ sudo apt update -y $ sudo apt upgrade -y $ sudo apt dist-upgrade -y $ sudo apt autoremove -y Passive API Reconnaissance Google Dorking Finds all publicly available WordPress API user directories. inurl:"/wp-json/wp/v2/users" Finds publicly available API key files. intitle:"index.of" intext:"api.txt" Finds potentially interesting API directories. inurl:"/api/v1" intext:"index of /" Finds all sites with a XenAPI SQL injection vulnerability. (This query was posted in 2016; four years later, there are currently 141,000 results.) ext:php inurl:"api.php?action=" This is one of my favorite queries. It lists potentially exposed API keys. intitle:"index of" api_key OR "api key" OR apiKey -pool GitDorking filename:swagger.json extension: .json TruffleHog $ sudo docker run -it -v "$PWD:/pwd" trufflesecurity/truf

XML Webservice (ASMX) - SOAP Request and Response Invocation logging

You are an integration developer. Eventualy you came into the state where there is nothing else you can debug, and you have to check which SOAP request it is built on the request, and which SOAP response you are getting from the server. C# XML Webservice (ASMX) - SOAP Request and Response Invocation logging In the legaccy .NET framework System.Web.Services , this means using soapExtensions to help you intersept the interaction with the webservice. This is done like so:  public class TraceExtension : SoapExtension     {         Stream oldStream;         Stream newStream;         string filename;         // Save the Stream representing the SOAP request or SOAP response into          // a local memory buffer.          public override Stream ChainStream(Stream stream)         {             oldStream = stream;             newStream = new MemoryStream();             return newStream;         }         // When the SOAP extension is accessed for the first time, the XML Web

Agile Leadership

Agile LeaderShip Reference: IPMA Reference Guide ICB4 in an Agile World https://www.ipma.world/news/ipma-reference-guide-icb4-agile-world/ 1. Perspective 1.1 Strategy Description: Change Blurred vision Agile strategy Emergent Create and adapt Giving meaning to work Key Competence Indicators Align agile teams with the organisational mission and vision Identify and exploit opportunities to influence organisational strategy Develop and ensure the ongoing validity of the business/organisational justification Determine, assess, and review critical success factors Determine, assess, and review key performance indicators Examples of Measures Reflects the mission and vision of the organisation Identifies new opportunities and threats which could alter the strategy Uses the CSFs for managing stakeholders Uses information systems for strategic performance 1.2 Governance, structures, and processes Description: Challenges Lean organisation Customer value Agile working Different structures Key Comp